The Altoona Mirror
Sunday, July 7, 2002
"Expert sees few murder connections"
By William Kibler
Staff Reporter
It's intriguing to think that the gruesome and
seemingly motiveless murders in Ocean City, Md., over Memorial
Day weekend were "thrill kills" and that the Duncans-ville
couple charged with them also could be responsible for a pair of
vicious murders here in the past year.
State police at Bedford continue to
investigate the possibility that Benjamin and Erika Sifrit may
have been involved in the murder of Dana Gates and the beating of
her boyfriend, Lorin Burket, in November in Queen.
But a nationally renowned criminal profiler
from Oregon, who has read all the newspaper stories about the
cases and seen available court documents about those killings and
the murder of Randy Buchanan in Juniata in June 2001, doesn't
think the Sifrits were killing for thrills or responsible for the
other murders.
The Sifrits' motive was more mundane than
thrilling, profiler Brent Turvey theorizes. Mere profit, he says.
Turvey is a forensic scientist and principal author and editor of
"Criminal Profiling: An Introduc-tion to Behavioral Evidence
Analysis," published by Academic Press, London.
What went wrong?
Something still unexplained -- although maybe
connected with drug use or psychopathic personality -- went wrong
in Ocean City, leading the Sifrits to kill Martha Crutchley, 51,
and her boyfriend Joshua Ford, 32, he contends.
But the Sifrits originally targeted the
Fairfax, Va., couple only for theft, Turvey believes.
By William Kibler BYLINE2:Staff Writer
It's intriguing to think that the gruesome and
seemingly motiveless murders in Ocean City, Md., over Memorial
Day weekend were "thrill kills" and that the Duncans-ville
couple charged with them also could be responsible for a pair of
vicious murders here in the past year.
State police at Bedford continue to
investigate the possibility that Benjamin and Erika Sifrit may
have been involved in the murder of Dana Gates and the beating of
her boyfriend, Lorin Burket, in November in Queen.
But a nationally renowned criminal profiler
from Oregon, who has read all the newspaper stories about the
cases and seen available court documents about those killings and
the murder of Randy Buchanan in Juniata in June 2001, doesn't
think the Sifrits were killing for thrills or responsible for the
other murders.
The Sifrits' motive was more mundane than
thrilling, profiler Brent Turvey theorizes. Mere profit, he says.
Turvey is a forensic scientist and principal author and editor of
"Criminal Profiling: An Introduc-tion to Behavioral Evidence
Analysis," published by Academic Press, London.
What went wrong?
Something still unexplained -- although maybe
connected with drug use or psychopathic personality -- went wrong
in Ocean City, leading the Sifrits to kill Martha Crutchley, 51,
and her boyfriend Joshua Ford, 32, he contends.
But the Sifrits originally targeted the
Fairfax, Va., couple only for theft, Turvey believes.
*oming monday
While nationally renowned criminal profiler
Brent Turvey doesn't think Erika and Benjamin Sifrit are
connected to several unsolved Blair County murders, he does have
plenty of theories about those killings and what police can do to
solve them.
Mirror Staff Writer William Kibler has the
details in Monday's Mirror.
A nationally renowned criminal profiler sees
little reason to think accused murderers Benjamin
*nd Erika Sifrit might be connected
*o a series of unsolved murders here.
*urder 3
The Sifrits' motives and modes of operation
have little in common with the murderers of Gates and Buchanan,
Turvey believes, al-though there is still a major chunk of the
Ocean City story untold.
It could conceivably reveal a Gates
connection, he allows.
But theft wasn't the motive in either the
Gates or Buchanan cases, he notes.
The Buchanan killing was a personal venting of
anger, he says. In the Gates case, the body was not cut up and
disposed of as in Ocean City. Nor was there forced entry in the
Buchanan case, as in secondary cases involving the Sifrits. And
where are the photos connected with either Gates or Buchanan, as
there were in other cases connected with the Sifrits? he asks.
The Sifrits, both 24, were connected to the
missing couple when they tripped an alarm attempting to steal $5,000
worth of T-shirts from a Hooters restaurant gift shop May 31,
court documents state. During the burglary investigation, police
found the Sifrits had several items belonging to the murder
victims.
Erika Sifrit eventually confessed that she and
her husband on May 25 invited Crutchley and Ford to the penthouse
at Rainbow Condomin-iums in Ocean City after spending the night
at a club. Later that night, Crutchley and Ford locked themselves
in a bathroom in fear of her husband, who kicked in the door and
shot the couple, she confessed.
She said Benjamin Sifrit then dismembered
their bodies, put the parts in five or six trash bags, and she
helped load the bags into their Jeep and dispose of them in a
trash bin in Delaware.
Before the murder, the Sifrits had been on a
run of burglaries and were grooming their victims, taking
pictures of them in their element, so they could later go back to
steal from them, Turvey says.
Their plan was working, he says. They may not
have been brilliant, but they were painstaking planners, he adds.
They had canvassed the Hooters restaurant in Ocean City carefully
before the burglary that led to their arrest and the discovery of
their connection with the murder, he says.
The Sifrits also canvassed the home of an
Altoona man before setting up a lost-keys ploy as justification
for returning to his house -- although they were foiled in their
attempt to burglarize.
They seemed to have been following the same
plan with Crutchley and Ford: grooming them, taking photos,
winning their trust. Erika Sifrit was flirtatious, according to
witnesses, and offered drugs to another man at a nightclub the
evening of the murder.
It's no discredit to the theory that they
departed from the plan, he says, noting that criminals often
don't stick to their plans.
Drugs, sex, jealousy?
Drugs may have played a part in what went
wrong for the Sifrits, Turvey suggests.
Police say there was a small amount of a white
powder substance -- consistent with personal use not drug dealing
-- and a rolled-up $20 bill at the murder scene. Erika Sifrit
reportedly snorted Xanax, Ocean City police investigator Scott
Bernal says.
Drugs can introduce an element of
irrationality, Turvey says.
Or maybe there was a sexual conflict, he adds.
According to witnesses, Erika Sifrit seemed to
be overtly sexual.
Maybe her husband got jealous, Turvey suggests.
Turvey doesn't mince words in his portrait of
Benjamin Sifrit. Turvey says he seems to be a full-blown
psychopath, a person who does not value people except as means to
an end, a person for whom others are a source of gratification or
an obstacle, nothing else.
Erika Sifrit may have had mental or emotional
problems, but she seemed to be in control, Turvey says, noting
her behavior often seems manipulative.
She had "a killing machine" at her
disposal, he says.
Benjamin Sifrit had been a Navy SEAL. Elite
warriors, SEALs are "over-the-top" people, egocentric,
cocky and highly capable, he says.
But also self-disciplined, which Benjamin
Sifrit was not, he adds.
Benjamin Sifrit was a washout, court-martialed
in October 2000 on two charges of going absent without leave,
three charges of insubordination, one charge of drunken or
reckless driving and one charge of wearing unauthorized insignia.
He's not a representative of the real SEALs mentality, Turvey
says, noting that he wanted to be something more than he is. He
seems to lack self-esteem, and Erika Sifrit put that to use, he
theorizes.
Where's the thrill?
Turvey thinks the Sifrits weren't yet done
with the Crutchley and Ford crime when police caught them at
Hooters.
"They were still cleaning up," he
says.
The Sifrits kept the victims' IDs and Atlantis
Condominiums key, not out of sheer carelessness or as trophies,
but so they could burglarize the victims' condominium, he
theorizes. They may have been carrying their IDs so they had
their home addresses for a burglary there, he adds.
Turvey ridicules the thrill-kill idea.
"Where's the thrill?" he asks.
"Where do you see the pattern of remorselessness and the
excitement associated with killing?"
And the idea they were imitating a movie
script like "Bonnie and Clyde" or "Natural Born
Killers" is silly, he believes.
Such ideas distract police from the real
issues, he says.
Real issues such as the possibility that the
Sifrits were selling stolen items over the Internet, he says.
Police could get traction on that one by
getting a search warrant for the Sifrits' Duncansville apartment,
he says.
But Ocean City police and Maryland State
Police agree there isn't probable cause yet to do that, Blair
County District Attorney Dave Gorman says.
Turvey thinks there is enough probable cause
and says some law enforcement officials just don't know how to
justify warrants.
Several police agencies in central
Pennsylvania are going to meet soon to discuss several local
burglaries they think the Sifrits committed, and that may lead to
a search warrant application, Richland Township Detective Kevin
Lehman says.
Turvey also recommended that police get all
photos they can lay their hands on to determine whether the
Sifrits took pictures of other victims.
And he recommended checking the Sifrits' phone
records.
Many police fail to do that, he says.
And they should check the national database to
ensure the Sifrits aren't on any "wants and warrants"
lists in other jurisdictions, he says. Police agencies don't
always do that, either, he says.
Police need to do more information sharing, he
says.
Investigation progress
Ocean City police are making progress in
figuring out a motive for the killings, department spokesman Jay
Hancock says. They've been learning some information from a third
couple who met the Sifrits and the victims on a bus that evening
and went with them to the nightclub before leaving their company,
he said.
Police probably will ask the FBI to profile
the case to help develop the motive, Bernal says.
From jail in Worcester County Detention
Center, near Ocean City, Erika Sifrit has been feeding police
information a little at a time about crimes the Sifrits committed
previously, Richland Township Detec-tive Kevin Lehman says. It's
enough to keep police interested and deal discussions going, he
says.
The separation of co-conspirators helps each
begin to think in his or her own self-interest, he says. The one
who gets off lightest ultimately is often the one who "gets
on the bus first" telling police what they did together, he
says.
That cooperative defendant often works under
the guidance of his or her attorney.
The attorney often makes a proffer, a
statement of "hypothetical" crimes the defendant might
be able to tell police about and a suggestion about what kind of
breaks might be available from prosecutors in return.
Prosecutors can't use the proffer as a
confession.
But police can investigate the validity of the
claims it makes.
The defendant's credibility in-creases with
the responsibility she accepts for what happened.
The cooperating co-defendant's culpability
isn't the issue, as much as credibility, her value as a witness
to make charges against the other guy stick.
Meanwhile, police in this area are planning to
meet to pool their information and brainstorm about what to do
regarding several burglaries in the region they believe the
Sifrits committed.
Police are wondering whether it makes sense to
file charges on the lesser cases, given the expense and security
risk of bringing them to Pennsylvania repeatedly for court
appearances, Lehman says.
But even if they don't file charges, it's
important to clear the burglary cases, he says. Police at first
believed they were "inside" jobs, done with a key.
Employees were under suspicion. They now think the Sifrits did
them with lockpicks. They'd like to reassure employers and
employees, he says.
Mirror Staff Writer William Kibler can be
reached at 949-7038.
Cite: Kibler, W. "Expert sees few murder connections,'" The Altoona Mirror, July 7, 2002